Ark Syndicate Management Limited 
Syndicate 3902 
11 
Independent auditors’ report to the member of Syndicate 3902 
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, The Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s Syndicate and Aggregate Accounts) Regulations 2008 requires us 
also to report certain opinions and matters as described below. 
Managing Agent’s Report 
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Managing Agent’s Report for the year ended 31 December 2024 is 
consistent with the syndicate annual accounts and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements. 
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the syndicate and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in
the Managing Agent’s Report. 
Responsibilities for the syndicate annual accounts and the audit 
Responsibilities of the Managing Agent for the syndicate annual accounts 
As explained more fully in the Statement of Managing Agent’s Responsibilities, the Managing Agent is responsible for the preparation of the syndicate annual accounts 
in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The Managing Agent is also responsible for such internal control 
as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of syndicate annual accounts that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 
In preparing the syndicate annual accounts, the Managing Agent is responsible for assessing the syndicate’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as 
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless it is intended for the syndicate to cease operations, or it has no 
realistic alternative but to do so. 
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual accounts 
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual accounts as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud 
or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted 
in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, 
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate annual accounts. 
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to 
detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is 
detailed below. 
Based on our understanding of the syndicate and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of 
regulatory principles, such as those governed by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, and those regulations set by the Council of 
Lloyd’s, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the syndicate annual accounts. We also considered those laws and 
regulations that have a  direct impact on the syndicate annual accounts such as The Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s Syndicate and Aggregate Accounts) 
Regulations 2008 and the Lloyd’s Syndicate Instructions . We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the syndicate annual 
accounts (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to the risk of fraud in revenue recognition, journal entries, and 
the potential for management bias in significant accounting estimates, particularly in relation to incurred but not reported claims provisions included in technical provisions 
and the estimation of gross written premiums. Audit. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included: 
•  Discussions  with  senior  management  involved  in  the  Risk  and  Compliance  functions,  including  consideration  of  known  or  suspected  instances  of 
noncompliance with laws and regulation and fraud;  
•  Assessment of any matters reported in the fraud suspicion log and the compliance issues and breach log and the results of management’s investigation 
of such matters; 
•  Reading key correspondence with Lloyd’s, the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to compliance with laws and 
regulations; 
•  Reviewing relevant meeting minutes including those of the Board and Audit and Risk Assurance Committee; 
•  Testing journal entries identified in accordance with our fraud risk assessment;